ADDRESSING FILICIDE: Fourth International Conference for Cross National Dialogue
14 – 15 November, 2019, Deakin Downtown, Melbourne, Australia
This post was prepared by Professor Thea Brown, Emeritus Professor, Social Work, Monash University
CALL FOR ABSTRACTS
Filicide is the killing of children by their parents.
The Monash Deakin Filicide Research Hub is now calling for abstracts and welcomes contributions to the forthcoming conference across all disciplines including law, psychology, social work, criminology, criminal justice, general medicine, psychiatry, nursing, policy research, academic, governmental and non-governmental
researchers, policy and program developers as well as from service organisations and victim advocacy and support groups.
The conference aims to address the following themes:
Types of filicide
All manifestations of filicide such as neonaticide, infanticide, single or multiple filicide, filicide-suicide, familicide, or any other intra-familial child homicide event.
Factors associated with filicide
Associated factors that are present or might a part of a filicide event including but not limited to, domestic violence, child abuse, substance abuse, alcohol
abuse, family law, separation or divorce, criminal history.
Education and prevention
Explores the role of education and prevention for communities, professional, existing programs, policy initiatives, risk assessment strategies, etc.
Criminal Justice System and Filicide
Explore the interactions between the different parts of the criminal justice
system and filicide events such as police, forensic experts, prison
programs, child death review committees, coroners, etc.
Any new research relating to filicide and media coverage of filicide events.
Post filicide services Examines the existence and role of programs for victims, their families, and other filicide survivors that may be available.
Creating child safe organizations and filicide
Surveys the impact of the newly implemented child safety policy on filicide prevention
We would like to emphasise that other themes may present themselves to contributors that are equally as important and we are happy to consider additional issues and themes.
NEW ABSTRACT DUE DATE AUGUST 30, 2019.
Abstracts should be 300 words long including the title of the paper. In addition please state the theme to be addressed, the authors’ names and addresses, (postal and email) and organisational address (postal and email).
Abstracts are to be emailed to firstname.lastname@example.org
For further information please visit our web site http://www.addressingfilicide.org or contact the organising committee:
Professor Thea Brown
Social Work, Monash University
Dr Danielle Tyson
Criminology, Deakin University
Dr Paula Fernandez Arias
Social Work, Monash University
Blog post by Mary Pirozek, Monash UniversityLaw Student and Amanda Selvarajah, Monash UniversityLaw Student
In mid 2018, Dr Becky Batagol approached me with an opportunity- she had just been in Canada and had seen something fantastic. In 2016, the Feminist Collective of the Faculty of Law at McGill University organised a photo campaign, showcasing a diversity of opinions why the law needs feminism. It was simple, yet powerful, with 33 individuals looking out into the camera and their reason superimposed above their head in their own handwriting. Since then, the team has gathered 1,000 portraits from across North America, organised National Forums and conferences, gathering feminist thinkers from students to judges. Becky wanted to do the same at Monash.
This is the first intercontinental campaign, and at first, I thought it would be easy- it was just a matter of lining people up, taking a photo, and writing up quotes. We quickly formed an excellent committee to organise all the elements- Laura Placella organises the social media, Amanda Selvarajah handled getting a photographer and other logistics, and Gabby Maginess handled the paperwork and the photography. Monash Education Academy soon came on board to fund the campaign, as it presented a way for Faculty members, especially the Monash Feminist Legal Studies Group, and students to work together. The photographer, Michelle McFarlane, was also very keen to lend her talents to the cause.
But the reality of what “Law Needs Feminism Because” required and what it hoped to achieve quickly became clear. To ask anyone to publicly use their face, name and identity to inspire a call to action for a cause so deeply necessary and overdue is a tall order. Standing in front of a camera at all is nerve-wracking, never mind when you’re doing so in the knowledge that you’ll be showcasing your innermost thoughts for a movement so intrinsically important to you.
It’s why I still stand in disbelief as I look at the bravery of our models and their diverse, honest and eye-opening points of view. Some focused on feminist jurisprudence, others the imminent career struggles and underrepresentation so many of us stand to face, many the experiences of women as they interact with the law and others provided insightful intersectional views, highlighting the pervasive gender inequalities that have found their way into the law from our larger, underlying social inequities. Across each photo, however, was also an undeniable optimism – that our words, this campaign and others like it would serve to push the needle forward.
Today, being able to see our photos side by side in the Law Library, serves as a powerful reminder that feminism and fights like it are won together and serves to offer just a few meaningful reasons as to why that fight is far from over. On an individual level, I had to confront my fears and insecurities to put my face and experience to the campaign. Yet when I saw my photo amongst all of the rest, all of those fears faded away. To take action requires a deep vulnerability but being part of a movement larger than yourself gives you strength to face that. The power of the Law Needs Feminism Movement is that it showcases each person’s unique perspective, acknowledging their individuality, and presents it as a collective which cannot be ignored.
So, we truly cannot be more grateful to Law Needs Feminism Because Canada, Dr Becky Batagol, the Monash Education Academy, Monash Feminist Legal Studies, the Monash Law Library, our executive committee and our incredible models for lending their time and support to such an incredible cause. For more information and further updates on Law Needs Feminism Because Monash please like us on Facebook and follow us on Instagram.
Mary Pirozek, Student in the Faculty of Law at Monash University
Amanda Selvarajah, Student in the Faculty of Law at Monash University
Mary Pirozek #LawNeedsFeminismBecause, Monash University, Michelle MacFarlane Photgraphy 2019
In this episode of the Scarlet letter, Tamara chats to one of our current law students, Mary Pirozek, who is implementing the Law Needs Feminism Because project at Monash University. Mary explains the origins and importance of this exciting exhibition, which is currently on display in the Law Library.
Law Needs Feminism Because at Monash University is a ground-breaking project which involves the exhibition of a series of 31 candid, powerful photographic portraits designed to challenge viewers, raise questions and spark conversations about gender in the law (and the legal profession). The portraits are of Monash male and female law students, staff and alumni.
Our Monash Law exhibition will be the first Australian use of the successful Law Needs Feminism Because format used at 18 universities across Canada and the US. Students who have participated in the project in North America have reported better preparation for professional practice, deeper engagement with curriculum, closer relationships among student cohorts and greater engagement in research practice. Vanita Sachdeva, the McGill law student who started the first LNFB project has said of the impact of the photos: “Turns out the conversation wasn’t as passé as we thought – students were yearning for a venue to talk about their experiences, wanting to show their support, and students looking for mentors.” This project is supported by the Monash Feminist Legal Studies Group, the Law Library and Monash Education Academy.
If you’d like to follow the social media campaign, one portrait is being released each day in August on instagram and facebook.
NZ is a global leader in the affirmation of sexual and reproductive rights, yet barriers to assisted reproductive technologies remain, particularly for single, poor, LGBTQ+, disabled, Māori and Pacific people, and new migrants.
Funded through Marsden (2019-2021), this research project uses cross-cultural comparative ethnography to explore for the first time the experiences of those unable to access state-funded assisted reproductive technologies, and who are thus rendered socially infertile.
The candidate will work alongside Associate Professor Sharyn Davies, Associate Professor Rhonda Shaw and Dr Elizabeth Kerekere and will contribute to understandings of how people denied access to ART create families in Aotearoa New Zealand. The research aims to ensure that all people in Aotearoa are able to create families regardless of gender, sexuality, ethnicity or ability. The candidate’s research will focus on understanding the challenges in creating a family when ART is required but are access denied. The project will have a particular focus on people often excluded from such access, including LGBTQ, disabled people, single people, Muslim migrants, Māori and Pacific peoples. PhD projects focusing on Māori or Pacific groups are particularly welcome.
Aims of this research
Examine how these individuals form families, including through fertility travel
Formulate new ways of theorising kinship and family life
Scholarships 2 and 3: Gender, Social inclusion and Water in Informal Settlements
Based at Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, and working under me, Associate Professor Becky Batagol and Dr Sheela Sinharoy, Emory University.
We’re looking for two research students from a broad range of backgrounds, especially anyone who has previously studied gender or/and international development. (Knowledge of water, WASH and water infrastructure is much less important.) We’d like someone with an honours and/or masters degree in anthropology, sociology, gender studies, international development, law, or similar. Strong experience with collecting and analyzing qualitative and/or mixed-methods data. International work experience with local partners/stakeholders is preferred but not required.
The project is an Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade’s (DFAT) Water for Women Fund grant, awarded to Monash and Emory universities to carry out research as a sub-study within the larger Revitalising Informal Settlements and their Environments (RISE) project to assess what does – and doesn’t – work in co-design, from an intersectional gender perspective. The goal of this sub-study is to generate new evidence on an intersectional gender and socially inclusive co-design approach that addresses social and technical aspects of safely managed water and sanitation, as well as structural inequalities faced by able-bodied and disabled women and girls, including in leadership, self-efficacy, safety and inclusion.
RISE is an action-research program exploring how to make water and sanitation more sustainable and inclusive by trialling the water sensitive cities approach in 24 urban informal settlements in Makassar, Indonesia and Suva, Fiji. Working alongside communities, governments, local leaders and partner institutions, the program aims to show that nature-based solutions – such as constructed wetlands and biofiltration gardens – can deliver low-impact, cost-effective health and environmental improvements. Underpinned by the emerging discipline of ‘planetary health’, RISE’s success will be measured by the health and wellbeing of residents – particularly children under five years of age – and the ecological diversity of the surrounding environment. More information can be found at www.rise-program.org.
We have 2 x 3-year scholarships going on this project.
Expected start: February 2020
• Applications close: 5pm, Friday 30 August 2019
• Domestic fees at Monash University covered
• Stipend: AUD $27,872 p.a.
• Please note that travel to research sites in Indonesia and Fiji is expected
Image-based sexual abuse (or IBSA) is defined as the non-consensual creation, distribution or threats to distribute nude or sexual images (photos or videos) of a person. It also includes altered imagery in which a person’s face or identifying marks appear in a pornographic photo or video, known colloquially as “deep fakes.”
Also known as “non-consensual pornography” or “revenge porn”, IBSA is an invasion of a person’s privacy and a violation of their human rights to dignity, sexual autonomy and freedom of expression.
According to a survey of 4,122 Australians we conducted for the Office of the eSafety Commissioner in 2017, one in ten Australian respondents had experienced a nude or sexual image of themselves being distributed to others or posted online without their consent. Young women aged 18 to 24 were among the most commonly victimised, as were Indigenous Australians and those with a mobility or communicative disability.
In a separate survey we conducted, we found the creation of nude or sexual images was even more prevalent. Of the 4,274 Australians aged 16 to 49 years that we surveyed, 20% said that someone had taken or created a nude or sexual image of them without their consent. Of those surveyed, 9% had experienced threats that a nude or sexual image of them would be shared.
When the creation, distribution and threats to distribute a nude or sexual image were combined, we found that more than one in five (23%) Australians had experienced at least one of these behaviours.
We also asked our survey participants whether they had ever perpetrated image-based sexual abuse. One in 10 reported they had taken, distributed or made threats to distribute a nude or sexual image of another person without that person’s consent. Men (13.7%) were almost twice as likely as women (7.4%) to admit to doing this.
How does IBSA impact victims?
Though the term “revenge porn” implies that the non-consensual sharing of nude or sexual images is based on the spiteful actions of jilted ex-lovers, research suggests the motivations for these behaviours – and the impacts on victims – are far more varied.
For instance, image-based sexual abuse is one way perpetrators of domestic violence attempt to coercively control a current or former intimate partner. Police and service providers have also described to us how images are used to threaten victims of sexual and domestic violence in order to prevent them from seeking help and reporting to police.
In other cases, nude and sexual images have been used as a form of bullying and harassment, particularly of young people. This can have severe impacts on a victim’s mental well-being, sometimes resulting in self-harm.
Many victims also experience high levels of psychological and emotional distress. In our study, we found approximately one in three people who experienced IBSA felt fearful for their safety – an indicator of potential stalking or intimate partner abuse being linked to the sharing of images online.
Yet some victims of IBSA don’t want to go through the emotional burden of pursuing criminal charges against a perpetrator. They just want the abuse to stop and the images to be taken off the internet, removed or destroyed. In such cases, victims can report their case to the Office of the eSafety Commissioner, which can issue formal removal notices to social media companies and other online platforms.
Image-based sexual abuse remains a social, health, legal and criminal policy challenge. Sadly, our previous research has found that not all Australians take this form of harm seriously, though there is widespread support for a criminal justice response which reflects the harm image-based sexual abuse can cause.
It is therefore important we continue with a multifaceted approach including education, prevention and training, as well as support services and justice responses, in order to properly address this type of intimate harassment and abuse.
The National Sexual Assault, Family and Domestic Violence Counselling Line – 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) – is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week for any Australian who has experienced, or is at risk of, family and domestic violence and/or sexual assault.